| Rapidly-deployable and flexible
maritime forces are at the heart of NATO planning –
and the UK is at the forefront of this new configuration.
With fundamental changes in the so-called ‘strategic
environment’ as the Cold War fades into history, NATO
has been carrying out a review of its force structures, the
scenarios in which they may be needed and how such forces
could be employed.
The khaki element was resolved through the creation of six
land formations, designated High Readiness Forces (Land).
When the focus moved on to the sea, three water-borne equivalents
were created as High Readiness Forces (Maritime) or HRF(M)s.
Three nations were selected to set up the necessary headquarters
and mechanisms; Italy and Spain are well advanced in the task,
but the UK was the first to be ready for evaluation, and the
man at the top is confidently awaiting confirmation of formal
accreditation.
Rear Admiral David Snelson, who recently handed over command
of the aircraft carrier HMS Ark Royal to Capt Alan Massey,
relishes the extra responsibilities.
“I went from one of the best jobs in the Navy to one
of the best jobs in the Navy,” said Admiral Snelson,
Commander UK Maritime Forces (COMUKMARFOR) in RN circles,
though awaiting formal notification of his title for NATO
matters.
“Bringing Ark Royal out of refit was a fantastic job
and a great honour, but to get to be the Royal Navy’s
only sea-going admiral, with a number of interesting deployments
on the horizon, is marvellous. I’m very grateful to
have the opportunity.”
The new UK HRF(M) formation has its headquarters at the COMUKMARFOR
base, the brand new Fleet Battle Staff HQ on Whale Island
in Portsmouth, but the team are expected to adapt quickly
to the nomadic life.
HRF(M) HQ staff are at seven days notice to commence operational
planning and 20 days’ notice to deploy for a NATO operation
– although in one of the many overlaps between NATO
and national responsibilities they are at much shorter notice,
with just 48 hours to react to a UK alert.
Each of the three HRF(M)s has a nominated command platform,
with aircraft carriers being the preferred option as they
must be able to absorb a large influx of HQ staff as well
as being able to take a complex command and control equipment
fit.
These command platforms could be home for HQ staff for prolonged
periods, and this group is also expected to be able to move
ashore to a temporary land headquarters if required.
Readying Ark for HRF(M) accreditation has been a significant
achievement with many agencies, including the Fleet Battle
Staff, FSL and ship’s staff overcoming significant challenges
to have her ready on time.
But people are just as important as the kit, and Admiral
Snelson said that the UK need for a flexible Maritime Battle
Staff HQ helped the Royal Navy swiftly adapt to the mix-and-match
nature of the NATO structure.
“In this new Battle Staff building there is myself
as the deployable two-star officer, and literally just across
the corridor is Maj Gen Tony Milton, the Commander UK Amphibious
Task Group,” said the admiral.
“Then we have got Commodore Richard Leaman, Commander
UK Task Group, Commodore Jamie Miller, who is Commander Amphibious
Task Group, and Brig Jim Dutton, who is Commander 3 Commando
Brigade.
“Between us we have more than 180 staff people, including
14 international officers.
“And out of all of them you can put together a whole
range of staff combinations of operational commanders and
groupings of staff officers. It all came out of the Fleet
First review, and is working very well.
“We also have the responsibility to provide this HRF(M)
for NATO, and we do that with most of the assets we already
have for the Maritime Battle Staff.
“What we are doing is providing NATO with a special
tailored capability, but one which can also be used by the
nation.
“One of the benefits it has brought is that it brings
a big allied NATO dimension to this HQ
in Portsmouth, and therefore strengthens our links with other
European navies.”
Admiral Snelson said that Naval Task Group 2003, which has
now deployed to the Eastern Mediterranean for exercises and
any possible call-up for operations in Iraq, showed many of
the characteristics of both the national and NATO functions,
being flexible and deployable anywhere at short notice –
though he stressed that NTG03 is a national, not a NATO group.
The UK HQ was first tasked with developing NATO accreditation
in April 2001, and after a good deal of hard work the full
operational capability evaluation was conducted on board Ark
Royal in early December 2002. |